By Richard E. Kelly
I am pleased to share a research paper that was published this month in the Journal of Family Studies about the culture of Jehovah’s Witnesses (JWs) living in Poland. It is the work of Igor J. Pietkiewicz, from the Psychology Faculty at the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Katowice, Poland.
Don’t let words like salutary, pathogenic and pathoplastic scare you. You can replace salutary with “beneficial”, pathogenic with “harmful”, and pathoplastic with “how culture allows individuals to express their symptoms and problems in a socially meaningful way.” Restated, the object of the study is to report:
Beneficial, Harmful and Modeling Aspects of the Jehovah’s Witness Culture
In my opinion, this research paper provides an accurate snapshot of the good and the bad aspects of the JW culture. I believe it to be fair, balanced and well worth your time to read it.
While I would have liked to have seen more, this paper is a good start, and it makes a strong case from what it doesn’t report. Yes, the JW culture of undue influence still requires more research. I am pleased to report that necessary task is now in its incubation stages.
But why is this research project and related report so important right now? One of my colleagues answered that question by saying, “Independent research like this starts and/or adds to a debate. In universities, in policy contexts, evidence is sought and minds are influenced. This is just one part of a process that can create change. This kind of report also supports the need for more research, gives credibility to those involved in the project and, hopefully, the money and resources will follow for more exploration, networking, case studies and evidence.”
When I asked Professor Pietkiewicz what his expectations were for this research paper, he said, “The target of this paper is psychologists, doctors, and educators, who come into contact with representatives of the JW Community (JWC). I wanted to make them aware of specific cultural norms they need to consider when working with JWs. I am going to look closer into specific problems now—challenges to develop bi-cultural identity by JW adolescents whose peers at school represent other communities and the experiences of shunning and disfellowshiping. I am mostly focused on what healthcare providers should know about this group to provide appropriate services and interventions.”
When he asked me if I had any ideas, I said, “The research paper begs for more research on JWs and ex-JWs, because I believe there are more ex-JWs than JWs in North America and Europe, and the toxicity of that experience is not very good. The JW culture is slowly becoming more egregious every day and this will change some of your assumptions about the cultural identity of JWs. The JW world that I grew up in the 1950s was definitely high-control and cult-like, but mild compared to how Watchtower manipulates the minds of its members today.”
Mr. Pietkiewicz responded poignantly by saying that he agreed with me and that “…the high control of the community over individuals can be very harmful. It seems that JWs do not trust their own basic goodness and fear their own instincts. That is why they need so much control and they tend to concentrate on fighting the evil, instead of cherishing love, acceptance, and freedom. Many of them see phenomena as either all-good or all-bad, without any shades in between. Such perception and thinking is characteristic of small children. Children grow up, however, and learn that the world is more diverse and there are not always straightforward answers to all questions.
“I can see that many JWs have a strong need for dependence from a controlling authority (parent, organization) and low tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity. They remain in a child’s role and refrain from growing up. The latter would involve questioning parents’ authority and developing one’s own views. But many children fear autonomy and want to stay with their parents, even as adults when their careers seem too demanding and controlling. Maturity is not something you get from your parents but something you manifest for yourself, despite outer conditions.
“So, you cannot only blame the community culture for all problems. It is people who create their culture and not the governing body. You are right, that the organization does not encourage autonomy and development, but people need to have a certain mindset to play that game.”
However, as a researcher he was obliged to take a neutral stance, although he clearly saw the risks and negative consequences of involvement with the JWC. And that is why he wants to do more studies on the acculturation of Jehovah’s Witness adolescents and also an epidemiological study of disfellowshipment.
While I have provided a link to the research paper in its entirety below, let me share the first page here that will explain the background of the study and provide more information about the man behind the research:
Link to PDF of full report: